Bending fatigue failure in gear tooth ijert journal. It results in progressive damage to gear teeth and ultimately leads. Interior fatigue fracture of gear teeth mackaldener 2000. This common type of failure which is a slow, progressive failure caused by repeated loading. Gear tooth bending fatigue is a key characteristic of the gear itself and varies with geometry, material, residual stress, surface finish, and hardness, among other variables. Contact fatigue failure analysis of helical gears with nonentire. Notches, grooves, surface discontinuities, and material imperfections will decrease the stress that can be withstood for a fixed number of cycles. In both cases, we are interested in the tooth load, which we got from the torque, t. The tooth fails in fatigue by two ways i tooth bending fatigue ii surface contact fatigue failure. Due to the application of load on the gear teeth, the gear tooth is subjected to bending. Pdf the failure investigation of a gear should be planned carefully to preserve evidence. Gears are more vulnerable to scuffing when they are new and their tooth surfaces have not yet been smooth end by runin.
Gears failure due to rolling contact fatigue rcf occur in a variety of modes such as spalling 4, micropitting 5, and tooth flank fracture 6. Of these, one of the most common causes of gear failure is tooth bending fatigue. The test analysis of transmission gears fatigue pitting. Tooth fatigue failure with additional evidence of pitting andor scuffing on the failed gear teeth. Surface contact fatigue failure of a case hardened. Fatigue life analysis of spur gears with precise tooth.
Table 1 lists six general classes of gear failure modes, of which the first four are the most common. Gearbox typical failure modes, detection and mitigation methods. The primary goal of fatigue testing is to optimize gear design by studying the effects of these. When evaluating the high cycle fatigue performance, the mutiaxial fatigue criteria and the damage accumulation rules are extensively employed for the fatigue life. For example, after a disc pack diaphragm fracor s or tureafter severe gear tooth wear, our vibration interlock set points and.
Gear bending fatigue failure and bending life analysis. Section 1 is an overview of parts analysis, and section 2 provides. In fact, grind temper is often the root cause of subcase fatigue failure. Finally, despite all of our efforts to avoid coupling failure, our installations and our personnel need be able to adequately respond to failure modes which experience shows are credible. In this paper only the tooth breakage is addressed and the developed computational model is used for calculation of tooth bending strength. Tooth bending fatigue is one of the most common modes of fatigue failure in gears. Although fractures usually start at the root of teeth, surface pitting or scuffing can cause stress raisers on the surface can initiate fatigue cracks at other positions. In another failure mode, called contact or hertzian fatigue, repeated stresses cause surface cracks and detachment of metal fragments from the tooth contact surface. Ansiagma 1010f14 ansiagma 1010f14 revision of ansiagma 1010e95 american national standard appearance of gear teeth terminology of wear and failure.
Gear tooth failure where fractured surfaces show a single brittle break with no sign of fatigue marking. Plant engineering eight common causes of gear failure. Gears based on their rotational motion and the heavy amount of load they carry are subjected to fatigue. It results in progressive damage to gear teeth and ultimately leads to complete failure of the gear. The appearance of the various distress and failure modes can differ between gears that have through hardened teeth and. The fracture surface of tiff has characteristic features that distinguish it from other gear failures. Tooth bending fatigue and surface contact fatigue are two of the most common modes of fatigue failure in gears. Toothbending fatigue is the most common mode of failure in gearing and results from cracking under repeated stresses below the ultimate tensile strength of the gear 4. How to diagnose gear failures neale consulting engineers.
Therefore, it is necessary to perform the dynamic analysis of spur gear. Gearbox typical failure modes, detection and mitigation. In order to respond to the new design situation, the gear designer must consider new phenomena of gears that were previously not a matter of concern. The crack trajectory leaves a convex surface on the broken tooth fragment and a concave surface on the gear body. Table 2 gives guidelines for minimum effective case depth to avoid subcase fatigue. Included are photo graphs of actual failures, along with probable cause and the most effective remedies. Typically arises from some major torsional shock in the drive system, often. Tooth bending fatigue the stresses on a gear tooth can be analysed by considering the tooth to be a. Fatigue failure may not be from the root of the tooth as with typical bending fatigue. Bending fatigue failure is the result of cyclic bending stress at the tooth root. Jgma 7001011990 terms of gear tooth failure modes jis b 0160. An understanding of these four common modes will enable you to identify the cause of failure.
National renewable energy laboratory national wind technology center. However, by introducing stress relieving features to the gear, the points of stress concentration can be decreased which enhances life of gear. This fact has demanded that new fatigue tests for gear materials be carried out and the fatigue resistance behavior with a high number of load cycles be analyzed. Study on gear contact fatigue failure competition mechanism. Optimum carburized and hardened case depth gear technology. The general types of failure modes in gear teeth in decreasing order of frequency include fatigue, impact fracture, wear and stress rupture. Abstracttooth bending fatigue is one of the most common modes of fatigue failure in gears. Estimating gear fatigue life gear solutions magazine your. Introduction gears are the most common means of transmitting motion and power in the modern mechanical engineering world.
However, by introducing stress relieving features to the gear, the points of stress concentration can be. Drive and coast sides of hypoid ring gear teeth etching surface fatigue 9 extreme pressure ep additives flank cracking surface fatigue. A new type of gear tooth fatigue failure is presented and analysed. Cause of failure may range from excessive wear to catastrophic breakage. Tooth fracture will cause more serious consequences. Usually only one or two teeth are affected and, apart from the broken teeth, the others are in good condition with no sign of cracks. When the same is repeated for a very huge number of cycles bending fatigue failure of the gear sets in. The total number of stress cycles n for the final failure to occur is. Failure in a gear train can in many cases be prevented.
The two dimensional models fatigue or yielding of a gear tooth due to excessive bending stress is two important gear design considerations. Fretting corrosion is deterioration of contacting gear tooth surfaces caused by minute vibratory motion. Figure 1 shows bending fatigue failure on a spur gear tooth. Geartooth bending fatigue is a key characteristic of the gear itself and varies with geometry, material, residual stress, surface finish, and hardness, among other variables. Causes of fatigue tooth failure fatigue failure of the gear teeth is the most common failure in gearing system. Tooth bending fatigue the stresses on a gear tooth can be analysed by considering the tooth to be a short.
Gear wreck will happen because of its tooth fatigue and tooth surface wear, so strength design from both side is necessary. Mackaldener and olsson studied the tooth interior fatigue fracture considering the hardness and residual stress gradients through a numerical simulation method and gear fatigue tests. It results in progressive damage to gear teeth and ultimately leads to complete. Appearance of gear teeth terminology of wear and failure. Paul langlois a comparison of tooth interior fatigue fracture load capacity with the predicted bending and pitting fatigue capacities, as calculated according to standards. Tooth surface pitting reduces transmission performance and increases operating noise. As the gear teeth are made more slender in an attempt to reduce the stiffness variation during the mesh cycle, thereby potentially reducing the noise, the risk of tiff is increased. It is initiated in the interior of the tooth and is given the self. At the same time, where the driven tooth addendum surface is in compression, fatigue can not occur.
All of these important technical aspects of gear technology are brought together in the present offering, gear materials, properties, and manufacture. Tooth bending and surface contact fatigue are two of the most common modes of fatigue failure found in gears. It results in progressive damage to gear teeth and ultimately leads to the complete failure of the gear. Gear contact fatigue is affected by various factors, including the lubrication state, tooth surface roughness, hardness gradient, and. Stresses on spur gear teeth the two primary failure modes for gears are. Gears used in aircraft and other applications may fail from scoring, tooth fracture due to bending fatigue, or surface pitting fatigue. Contact fatigue failure criterion when the single tooth pitting area rate achieves 4% or the gear pair pitting area rate achieves 0. Tooth fracture failure oc curred with the cbs 600 gears after overrunning a fatigue spall. Interior fatigue fracture of gear teeth mackaldener. Bearing gear micropitting grindhonepolish gear teeth superfinish, coat, or smooth bearing rings or elements avoid shotpeened flanks. Under these variable loads a tooth breakage, which most often results in a total gear failure, must be take into account during the stages of gear design or load capacity calculation. As the gear teeth are made more slender in an attempt to reduce the stiffness variation during the. Common causes of wear or failure include normal wear again, gear coupling teeth are designed to wear over time, lack of lubrication, torque overload, misalignment, fatigue of flange or bolt, and thrust loading sleeve seal end.
Spur gear tooth stress analysis and stress reduction. Two kinds of teeth damage can occur on gears under repeated loading due to fatigue. The good news is there are only five common failure modes. The problem of determination of gear service life with regard to bending fatigue in a gear tooth root is analysed in this paper. A several kinds of numerical models, including moving force model, for determination the service life of gears in regard to bending fatigue in a gear tooth root, is presented. Research labora tory a new highspeed, highcycle, geartooth. An update on the life analysis of spur gears ntrs nasa. Gear design and strength iupital has good strength, durability, wear resistance, and chemical resistance, so can be used to each gear. Therefore, scuffing is the most immediate failure mode that must be dealt with. Common gear failures gear solutions magazine your resource. The fracture surface of tiff has characteristic features that distinguish it.
The cbs 600 material exhibited pitting fatigue lives both in rollingelement speci mens and in gears at least equivalent to that of aisi 9310. Overheating gear teeth during operation or manufacturing such as grind temper can lower case hardness, alter residual stresses, and reduce resistance to subcase fatigue. So, gear as a key component of mechanical transmission, its fatigue life should be predicted and designed precisely. The present work is intended to study surface damage on gear tooth flanks, in. Contact stress and shear stress analysis of spur gear.
Tooth bending fatigue failures in gears sciencedirect. Load distribution load distribution on gear tooth in order to conduct a dynamic stress analysis the loads have to be evaluated. The research is based on a computational model that consists of two. One such phenomenon is a new gear failure type, tooth interior fatigue fracture tiff. Surface contact fatigue failure of a case hardened pinion. Gear has failed when it can no longer efficiently do the job for which it was designed. Numerical modelling of gear tooth root fatigue behaviour. Fortunately, gear couplings often provide signature failure modes that can be quickly identified and diagnosed. Theoretically, different types of contact fatigue failure modes occur simultaneously during gear operating. This paper gives a finite element model for investigation of the stresses in the tooth during the meshing of gears for material steel 15ni2cr1mo28.
Various defects in gear the general types of failure modes in decreasing order of frequency include fatigue failure, impact fracture, wear and stress rupture. Ansiagma 1010e95 1995 describes the characteristics of the failure mode. The resulting damage is one of the most frequent causes of gear failure, and is directly related to the shear fatigue strength profiles of case hardened materials and. The main factors that cause the failure of gears are the bending stress an d contact stress of the gear tooth. Surface contact fatigue failure of a case hardened pinion shaft.
Tooth interior fatigue fracture robustness of gears. Runin wear is a type of wear with slight asperity occurring on startup. Comparison of tooth interior fatigue fracture load capacity to standardized gear failure modes by baydu c. Thus, the critical to fail position of gearpinion tooth depends not only. Coupling credible failure modes and owner options to intervene.
Stress on a gear tooth the tooth is loaded and stressed by. Contact stress and shear stress analysis of spur gear using. Stress analysis has been a key area of research to minimize failure and optimize desi gn. Fatigue failure of gear teeth are result of different conditions prevailing during the operation or inaccuracy within the gears. Many modes of gear failure have been identified, for example fatigue, impact, wear or plastic deformation. This common type of failure is a slow, progressive failure caused by repeated loading. The primary goal of fatigue testing is to optimize gear design by. A computational model for determination of service life of gears in regard to bending fatigue in a gear tooth root is presented.
Gear contact fatigue is affected by various factors, including the lubrication state, tooth surface roughness, hardness gradient, and residual. This fatigue failure of the tooth decides the reliability of the gear. On the dedendum of the driving tooth, as the driven tooth slides downward, the driving tooth surface is subjected to tension, surface fatigue results, and the tooth wears. No such failure mode occurred with the aisi 9310 gears. It also gives methods for preventing gear tooth failures. Estimating gear fatigue life gear solutions magazine. The characteristics of this failure mode are discussed in detail and a number of actual case studies are presented which show the occurrence of this failure mode. As one of the classic contact fatigue failures, pitting mainly appears at a hundred of microns beneath the surface subjecting to the contact stress condition. It is a highly variable and stochastic failure property. Hammering wear impact fatigue hypothesis wecirwea failure mode on roller bearings. Several causes of fatigue failure have been identified.
770 1432 1394 1078 183 998 522 1289 977 1067 1207 1179 255 598 1530 236 973 417 683 1256 411 291 228 1064 826 1024 1089 442 375 46